Malibu Surfside News

Malibu Surfside News - MALIBU'S COMMUNITY FORUM INTERNET EDITION - Malibu local news and Malibu Feature Stories

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Malibu City Council Assesses Disaster Preparation Shortcomings

• Members Allocate Funding for Preliminary Improvements as Review Continues

BY BILL KOENEKER


As smoke and fire raced toward Malibu City Hall and quickly cut off power, the municipality’s emergency operations center had to be moved out of the Stuart Ranch Road offices onto the Pepperdine University campus after power failures that Sunday morning closed down the EOC.

Malibu City Council members last week at a special meeting said they did not want that to happen again and allocated $200,000 for power equipment and other supplies to rectify the situation.

Council members also explored whether city officials should have satellite phones or other hardware for emergencies. They instructed the city manager to use his discretion in spending the money.

City Manager Jim Thorsen acknowledged there were “a couple of issues” during the fire and suggested he would use the funds to shore up “the weakest links.”

Thorsen said he and his staff would look at not only acquiring a generator to power the EOC, but purchasing an additional unit.

Emergency Preparedness Coordinator Brad Davis indicated the city does have back up generators, but none of them are set to automatically go on when the power goes out. Thorsen said an automatic system is required.

Council members indicated they wanted to see the city’s power problems and any other obvious emergency preparations taken care of immediately.

Councilmember Andy Stern disagreed with the majority, saying there should be a study before money was turned over. But the measure passed on a 2-1 vote, with the approval of Councilmembers Sharon Barovsky and Pamela Conley Ulich. Mayor Jeff Jennings and Councilmember Ken Kearsley were absent.

There were other lessons that city officials should have learned from last January’s Malibu Road fire as they had been previously addressed.

“We knew Charter might go out. We decided last January to get a television [satellite] dish and we could watch what the media broadcast. We did not lose television,” added Davis, who acknowledged that the city was without its cable broadcast television on channel three on Charter.

Davis said the city’s radio station, which does not perform very well during the best of times, performed poorly during the fire.

Thorsen said he wants to look at upgrading the signal tower for better radio communications. “Maybe we will get a tower on one of the islands,” he added.

Davis said, in the meantime, he would suggest that if folks want to get their information via radio, they stay tuned to one of the all-news stations such as KNX.

The EPC said the city was most successful in getting information out via the telephone hotline.

“It does not need a lot of technology. We had our first information out by 6 a.m.,” he added.

The city official also explained some of the evacuation procedures taken by the city. He said a facility was set up at the Trancas end of Zuma Beach. “We were telling people to go to that side of the beach,” he noted.

Davis said the city was not in the loop when Agoura Hills High School was tapped for a Red Cross Center. “We said we need Malibu to be in on it. We said Malibu High School should be designated as an evacuation center,” he said.

Thorsen indicated that the city’s emergency call system was not activated. “We had already evacuated the streets. We were already past that point and did not activate it,” he added.

The city’s emergency call system is operated by a private company, American Emergency Notification, which operates a computerized phone system that can reach thousands of numbers an hour, providing detailed emergency information. The system can leave voice mail and answering machine messages and also can redial if there is a busy signal or no answer.

“We are not sure the company can provide what we need. We are going to be looking at that,” added Thorsen, who explained that the city wants to look at developing more of an e-mail warning system, but didn’t explore the power concerns related to that.

Role of Downed Power Lines in Start of Malibu Wildfire Is Being Investigated

• Condition of Southern California Edison Poles Targeted for Scrutiny

BY HANS LAETZ


Although fire investigators have yet to release an official report, the first fire crews to arrive at the scene of last week’s Canyon Fire pinpointed a splintered Southern California Edison Co. wooden pole as the apparent source of the fire that threatened eastern Malibu with destruction.

If the pending official investigation confirms that, this would be the second time in 11 years that power lines in or near Malibu Canyon have failed in windstorms, both times causing calamitous fires.

The Office of the State Fire Inspector has sent investigators to Malibu to see if some of the power poles in the canyon are old and spindly, and stressed by heavy loads and winds, possibly making them susceptible to failure.

“You can see from the burn pattern, it spread from that line,” yelled a firefighter from Los Angeles County Engine 89, pointing through the wind and ash in fire-filled Malibu Canyon about two hours after the pole was snapped by estimated 100-mph wind gusts.

Twelve hours later, after the fire had moved on, the splintered poles were photographed where they fell on the roadside, just north of the old Sheriff Honor Camp turnoff above Rindge Dam. It appeared that the poles had snapped in the wind, as they did not burn in the fire.

The poles were removed the next day by Edison crews working around the clock, in terrible wind and smoke conditions, to rebuild the circuit and clear the road of two miles of tangled lines and poles. Numerous poles fell on or near the canyon road during the windstorm and resulting fire last weekend, officials said.

Calls to Southern California Edison’s news office this week were not returned. Los Angeles County fire officials said their investigation was continuing.

Back in 1996, the Calabasas-Malibu fire was sparked by a power line dropping from SCE poles south of U.S. 101, east of Malibu Canyon-Las Virgenes Road, and about six miles north of last week’s failure. The ’96 fire injured 11 people, including six firefighters overrun by a sudden flashover in Corral Canyon.

Last week’s fire cost $5.8 million to extinguish, and injured three firefighters. Damage estimates are not yet tallied, but parts of Malibu were evacuated and local schools and businesses were closed for up to a week.

The state investigators are assisting LAC investigators to determine the cause of the Canyon Fire, said Cal Fire’s chief of law enforcement, Dave Hillman, from the emergency command post in Sacramento.

“Our role in the investigation is purely to investigate the cause of the fire,” he said Tuesday.

Spindly-looking power poles along Malibu Canyon Road have been a source of concern for several months for some residents, including Ed Meyer, whose house high above the canyon on Piuma Road overlooks the sinuous route below. Meyer said he has been warning Edison for several months that its older poles were falling over.

“Those lines were hanging out over the road for months,” Meyer said. “The company has replaced some of the poles with new ones, and put up a steel pole in one place, but a lot of those old poles are down there still.”

Meyer is most concerned with wooden poles that anchor a span of wires that cross the entire canyon on one reach, more than a quarter mile from Malibu Canyon Road up to the summit on Piuma. “Those poles swing like crazy in the winds.

“This whole system has been weakened for years, and I think there was so much tension on the whole thing that it snapped and pulled the whole string down,” he said this week.

City officials said they wanted to see an official report, but said power poles are probably not designed to withstand the winds of 100 mph that swept down the canyon that Sunday morning.

“Those wooden poles are 19th century technology,” said Malibu City Councilmember Ken Kearsley. “We have a choice: we can underground [the lines] at the cost of a million dollars a mile, or we can put them on steel poles.”

But Kearsley said it was important not to rush to judgment on the issue. “Those were hundred-mile-an-hour winds,” he cautioned. “To what extent of wind do you plan for?”

Meyer has more than a passing interest in the string of power poles in Malibu Canyon that for years had been tilting over at an angle: his home was nearly burned in last week’s fire.

“I lost two acres of succulents next to my house, which I foamed.” Meyer said. “You’ve gotta foam up here to save your house.”

“But this was no act of God, they have been neglecting this for years,” Meyer said.

Malibu Slowly Returns to the Routines of Daily Life after the Canyon Fire

• Signs of Recovery Are Evident Throughout the Community

BY HANS LAETZ


As fire investigators concentrated on the possible failure of a power line in Malibu Canyon, students returned to classes, construction crews labored to remove debris, and life in the Malibu fire area began to take on a more routine status.

Although no local loss estimate has been tallied yet, the Los Angeles County Fire Department says it took $5.8 million in public funds to extinguish last week’s fire, tentatively blamed on 100 mile-per-hour winds that snapped power poles in Malibu Canyon.

Initial official damage assessments missed some classroom damage at Our Lady of Malibu Catholic School, and two businesses closed by fire at the shopping center: the First Bank and Trust Company’s branch, and the city’s newest Starbucks outlet, both red-tagged due to roof damage.

Construction crews at the stricken Malibu Colony Shopping Center on Monday finished demolishing a clock tower and several sections of roof that roared with flame during the Oct. 21 Canyon Fire, which burned 4566 acres and destroyed 12 structures and damaged another 20 in Malibu.

School children returned to their classrooms at Webster Elementary and Our Lady of Malibu schools Monday, and found the two neighboring schools on Winter Canyon freshened up thanks to heroic volunteer efforts.

Two classrooms at the parochial school burned. A computer lab in a trailer was destroyed and the ceiling of the 7th/8th grade classroom was charred.

A large crew of demolition experts labored all week at Our Lady of Malibu to remove debris. “They have to redo the ceiling in that classroom,” said parent volunteer Scott Schoenberger. “That class will meet in the Fellowship Hall this week.”

Across the street at Webster, “we had about 30 parents put in a five-hour workday Sunday, to clean the yard up,” said Webster’s PTA president, Dorothy Reinhold. “We removed anything and everything that looked burned.”

Several truckloads of burned trees, playground equipment and a destroyed art-project shed had to be carted off. By Monday, the only sign of fire was the singed trees ringing the campus.

Parent Catie Norris had arranged for the Sylmark Corporation to donate 25 air purifiers to remove any lingering smell from the classrooms.

Other than the landscaping, only two temporary storage rooms were lost to flames at Webster. “Stunning,” was the assessment from principal Phil Cott, as he watched pupils arriving for class Monday after a week’s closure.

At City Hall, it was business as usual this week, the power back on and employees processing permit requests. The downstairs offices were being painted over the weekend the fire struck, further complicating an almost Murphy’s Law set of circumstances that included the municipal offices being surrounded by fire, blacked out, its cable TV station off the air, its cable system down for four days, and its Internet servers dead.

“I’m very, very proud of the city staff’s response” that Sunday morning, said City Councilmember Andy Stern. “(Administrative services director) Reva Feldman literally drove through flames to get to City Hall, and when she got in, it was filled with smoke.”

Mario Reyna, the city’s computer administrator, also braved surrounding flames to retrieve hard drives with vital records, Stern said. The leased building itself did not burn, although trees and brush on all four sides did.

Craig George, the city’s environmental and building safety manager, said Monday that “not one” septic or sewage system failed anywhere in Malibu due to the fire. He and other staffers are compiling a tally of damages within city limits but have not completed it yet, said city manager Jim Thorsen.

Los Angeles County Health Department officials put out a news release last week that said the fire had caused a “minor” spill of 20,000 gallons of treated sewage into the ocean at the Malibu Bay Club apartments, located near County Line.

That prompted several news agencies to mistakenly report that beaches in Malibu were polluted by sewage systems incapacitated by the fire.

Verizon crews continued Monday to repair cables in the Civic Center area that were burned, but outages were reported only in actual burn areas. The Charter Communications connection to the outside world was reconnected as promised on Wednesday, restoring phone, Internet and local television service.

County Supervisors Unanimously Approve LCP for Santa Monica Mountains

• Malibu Repesentative on Board Gets OK for Two Dozen Changes to Planning Document

BY BILL KOENEKER


The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved the Local Coastal Program for unincorporated areas of Malibu and the rest of the Santa Monica Mountains at its meeting this week.

The board had met last week and continued the matter until this Tuesday when, on a 4-0 vote with Supervisor Gloria Molina absent, it approved the document.

Planners had recommended 30 policy changes to the document and Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, who represents this area, offered 24 more revisions.

“The LCP will dramatically reduce zoning densities, ban new residential and commercial development in Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas, prohibit new development within 50 feet of significant ridgelines, require thorough biological review prior to the issuance of any coastal development permit, reduce grading and site disturbance, dramatically limit the footprint of new development and preserve the free movement of wildlife throughout the Santa Monica Mountains Coastal Zone,” Yaroslavsky said of his revisions.

Those changes include prohibiting camp fires in the mountains, facilitating the rebuilding of homes destroyed in a disaster, and banning new development on slopes of 50 percent or greater.

That livestock containment facilities would be grandfathered with respect to mandated setbacks; the maximum size of a building site in watersheds would be limited to 10,000 square feet; and Arizona crossings would be phased out are some of the approved changes.

Yaroslavsky’s motion was approved by the board and incorporated with staff recommendations.

A county planner indicated the department would incorporate these revisions into the document and then it will be brought back as a consent item for final approval.

At that point, the LCP will be submitted to the California Coastal Commission for certification. That meeting is not expected to take place until the middle or end of 2008.

When the last of the public speakers had testified, the focus was on what is called backyard horse boarding. Additionally, speakers were critical of what they called the “commercialization of the mountains” as the LCP allows bed and breakfast inns in certain zones. Some heated discussion focused on issues related to the land use designation of Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area.

Equestrians showed up in full force at the meeting, some to counter what they perceived as an anti-horse stance by a group that got involved late in the planning process and warned that some of the provisions of the LCP represented a loosening of restrictions.

Jacky de Haviland, the president of Citizens for a Better LCP, insisted her group and the equestrians are not that far apart. “I think the equestrians don’t realize how close we are. They decided we are the enemy. We never said anything about keeping horses out of the mountains,” she said.

Horse owners, from the onset, had urged county planners to highlight equestrian uses because of the historical significance of horses in the Santa Monica Mountains.

Planners acknowledged in keeping with the spirit of coastal access, equestrian uses would play a role in the LCP process, but insisted the regulations about horse boarding were not loosened in the planning document.

De Haviland indicated they now want to see restrictions tightened up. She and others praised Yaroslavsky’s contributions to the document, but said that other issues would need to be addressed before the California Coastal Commission when it takes up the matter of certifying the plan.

Another issue that surfaced on the day of the hearing was a published report that the coastal agency would take issue with the county’s stance on ESHAs.

County planners had early on acknowledged that they were treating ESHAs differently than what the Coastal Commission had compelled the City of Malibu to implement, but encountered no discouragement from the state agency until this week. “We disagree with the Coastal Commission,” said a county planner.

Yaroslavsky insists that because of the Santa Monica Mountains’ “environmental sensitivity, susceptibility to wildfires and geological hazards, the proposed LCP unequivocally establishes the principle that resource protection and public safety have priority over development.”

Double Fatality Puts Malibu’s Kanan Dume Road in the Spotlight—Again

• Authorities Are Stymied by Drivers Who Do Not Use Arrestor Bed to Stop Runaway Vehicles

BY ANNE SOBLE


A fiery collision involving a gravel-filled double trailer truck and two automobiles at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Kanan Dume Road claimed the lives of two men—including Malibu resident William Weissberg—and resulted in serious injuries for Dave Wise, a veteran county firefighter.

Flames from the crash could have ignited office complexes adjacent to the bluff where the runaway truck exploded about 10 a.m. last Wednesday, just as wildfire-weary Malibuites were getting the smoke and ashes out of their systems.

The driver of the big rig was identified by authorities as Hovik Oganes Papikyan, 34, of Glendale.

County Sheriff’s Traffic Sgt. Philip Brooks said Papikyan was traveling illegally on Kanan Dume, which is closed to vehicles over 8000 pounds with more than two axles.

The sheriff’s department spokesperson said a preliminary review of accident data indicates the truck driver was traveling about 70 mph when he may have experienced brake failure on the road’s steep grade. He ran the red light at the PCH intersection, crashing first into the Mercedes driven by Weissberg, then into Wise’s Mercury SUV.

After it hurled over the two vehicles, the truck smashed into the embankment, shifting the gravel load forward, as well as sending it flying into the air, and killing the driver, according to Brooks.

A question repeatedly asked at the accident scene was why Papikyan did not use the 800-foot runaway vehicle arrestor bed. The emergency lane was installed in 1987 following a rash of similar truck accidents, including two in a three-week span that claimed three lives. At that time, there was a community outcry that the intersection was a safety hazard.

The arrestor bed, which is 16 feet wide and 2.5 feet deep (filled with gravel and sand), is bounded by a side concrete railing and terminates with a phalanx of 72 barrels—each filled with 1400 pounds of sand—that serve as impact-reducing devices.

There are 21 signs alerting drivers to the road’s steep grade, the need to check brakes, and the presence of the runaway vehicle lane, which has averted well over a dozen crashes.

One factor expected to be addressed in the accident report is that the last, largest warning sign was knocked down during the weekend before the accident by the nearly 100-mph winds that fueled the wildfire that started Sunday, Oct. 21. That sign was not put back up until after the accident.

Another issue expected to be raised is the concern voiced by Brooks that truck drivers were violating the truck ban rather than taking the longer detours through Camarillo-Oxnard or Santa Monica that were mandated by the closure of Malibu Canyon Road due to the wildfire. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and the California Highway Patrol personnel were taxed by the fire, and there was no way to step up law enforcement on the one canyon route that remained open.

William Weissberg, 58, the Malibuite who was killed in the crash, was not identified until this Monday. Weissberg was a Century City attorney who was married and lived in the Malibu Knolls area, one of the neighborhoods hardest hit by last week’s Canyon Fire. A colleague said Services for Weissberg were reportedly slated for this week at Mt. Sinai Memorial Park.

The east Malibu resident’s car was totally incinerated by the intensity of the fire at the crash scene. His name was withheld for five days because of the additional time required for identification and notification of next of kin.

At the wheel of the second struck vehicle, a white SUV, was a 25-year county firefighter, Dave Wise, who suffered a smashed foot that may require surgery, broken ribs, extensive bruising and possible head trauma.

Wise, 45, was pulled from his burning car by Ocle Martinez, who works in property management at the Point Dume Professional Center above the embankment that the truck drove into, and sheriff’s deputies who were among the first to respond to the scene.

The veteran firefighter, who has been released from the hospital and is recuperating at his home in West Hills, described the crash to the Malibu Surfside News: “I remember a sound of heavy metal, sparks, flying metal and debris, then I passed out...when I came to, there was fire all around me...my clothes were soaked with diesel fuel.”

He said that he still can’t believe that he “survived the [flames and fumes]. I am so grateful...” His wife, Penny, said simply that “he has a guardian angel...if the truck had hit the car an inch or two in either direction, Dave would be dead.”

Wise paused, then softly explained that when he was assigned to local Fire Station 99 two years ago, his was the second unit to respond when an overloaded double rig of roof tiles barreled through the same intersection. The light was green and the intersection was empty at the time.

The driver of that truck was killed but a passenger in the cab survived.

An intensive investigation of last Wednesday’s accident is expected to take several weeks or more, according to Brooks. In addition to questions about signage placement, investigators will try to determine the truck’s condition, what kind of training the driver had and whether he was directed to use Kanan.

The LASD spokesperson said it is possible that “damage to the truck is so intensive that the investigation may yield few, if any, clues.”

Brooks said the possibility that Papikyan panicked or froze at the wheel is not being ruled out.

A family member told Brooks that the driver spoke and read English. It is surmised that he knew he was on the road illegally and saw the signs about the runaway vehicle lane.

Why he ignored the arrestor bed and tried to turn onto Pacific Coast Highway, causing the truck to go into a centrifugal skid, may never be known.

• The Publisher’s Notebook •

Malibu Fire Aftermath: Nature Has to Heal

BY ANNE SOBLE


The aftermath of a major disaster is fraught with the extremes of every human emotion. When the grieving has stopped, as it should, the process of recovery begins. Whether in the raised voices of the congregants of a burned-out church or the more personal realization by someone who has lost every material possession that things may be gone but memories last forever, humans have an infinite capacity to heal. Just as we reach out to help those who have been affected by the recent fire, so can we help nature heal from an event that has claimed not just acreage but wildlife habitat. Animals, large and small, have lost food and shelter, and this may result in an unfortunate increase in human interaction, not by choice but because it is unavoidable. From the deer herds of Malibu Canyon that have graced this newspaper’s cover, to the mountain lions who traverse miles in their wanderings, sightings may increase. Coyotes, raccoons and other mid-size animals may turn to human habitat as an alternative food source, but under no condition should wildlife be fed or otherwise acclimated to human contact. Extra precautions should be taken with family pets and other domestic animals.

Human patience can be sorely tested when nature is out of kilter. After the 1993 wildfire, when my ranch boundaries had been scorched by menacing flames and extensive (and extraordinarily successful) backfiring, I thought that every squirrel in the Malibu hills had sought refuge inside my gates. My livestock feed bill almost doubled because as soon as grain was put out, dozens of squirrels came out of nowhere to ravage it. New feed containers helped, but time solved the problem. Within a few months, the squirrels’ natural habitat was restored and they moved on. If rodents or other small critters become a short-term problem, there should be absolutely no consideration of using rodenticides. Be patient, and give nature a chance. There may be some inconvenience, or even some loss, but poisoning the wildlife food chain will do far more damage and ultimately create a far greater imbalance.

The shortage of water in wilderness areas during the current drought has been exacerbated by the recent fire. My personal exception to the prescriptive against wildlife interaction (frowned upon in some quarters) involves providing water sources, making certain they are not located where human encounter is likely. I have submerged horse troughs in my backcountry (well outside the fenced corrals and residential areas) that are kept filled with well water. Those who reside in more urbanized areas of Malibu might opt to fill a bird bath, or consider hanging a hummingbird feeder, as their contribution to thirsty critters. Whatever we do, we must not add to the plight of the already scarred land and prevent it from coming back on its own.

Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District Puts Renewal of Parcel Taxes on February Ballot

BY HANS LAETZ


Malibu voters will not only decide on a presidential favorite on “Super Tuesday,” but will vote in the February 5 election on whether to retain a $346-per-parcel real estate tax for the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District.

The vote on whether to extend the parcel tax will come on the heels of a controversial, last-minute decision by the school board two weeks ago to strip half of the bond money recommended by district staff to build new classrooms at Malibu High School, and divert those funds to replace badly dilapidated sections of Santa Monica High School.

The parcel tax renewal is viewed as critical by school backers, who say it has made the hiring of 50 teachers possible. The special tax makes up for inadequate funding from state property and income taxes, and is credited by the district for the stellar marks that students at its 17 campuses get on state tests.

Class sizes in core classes such as reading, writing and mathematics are reduced using teachers hired by parcel tax receipts, and the entire music and arts programs rely on the parcel tax.

A poll taken by the district of voters found support hovering around 70 percent for the tax measure. The poll was careful to point out that taxes would not go up if the parcel tax measure is passed by 67 percent of the electorate—it will only extend taxes that have already been approved by the voters.

But the matter will go before the Malibu electorate as it reacts to a last-minute decision by the school board to cut in half the recommended $27 million Malibu High construction budget, and instead recommend that $13.5 million of that total be channeled to bigger construction needs at the district’s 70-year-old Santa Monica High School.

Board president Kathy Wisnicki, the lone Malibu resident on the school board, was unable to attend the meeting due to an ankle injury. She told Malibu parents in an e-mail that “although the outcome was unfortunate, I believe that the district staff and I will be able to craft a solution that is acceptable to the Board and restore funding to our Malibu schools.”

Wisnicki wrote to assure parents that “district officials said Malibu parents should not assume that the entire $27 million proposed by district staff for Malibu High is lost, because as much as $40 million in bond funds is still uncommitted.”

Several Malibu High parents spoke at the meeting at Santa Monica City Hall, but were outnumbered by placard-waving Samohi parents concerned that Malibu was getting a much larger per-student share of construction monies than their kids. Nine of the 10 board members are Santa Monica residents, although 20 percent of the students attending district schools live in Malibu.

Malibu principal Mark Kelly said he also spoke at the meeting, and said afterward he found it “unfortunate that the Samohi parents pitted one group of kids against another.”

“It doesn’t have to be that way,” Kelly said after the vote, “and the process that was set up to weigh and evaluate each project should not have been bypassed like that either.”

At issue is a proposal from district staff that $27 million be set aside for a new library at Malibu High, as well as a new science classroom wing to replace a substandard 40-year-old junior high classroom block. The board’s vote eliminated funding for the junior high classrooms.

Assistant Superintendent Mike Matthews, a former Malibu High principal, said the bond funding process has only just begun. “I want to assure Malibu residents that it is our goal and objective to get what is needed built at both of the schools.”

Matthews said district staff is only taking the first steps in finding joint-funding sources from other government agencies to subsidize multiple-use projects at both campuses, which he said will stretch construction budgets and further the district’s goal of integrating the two high schools more with surrounding communities.

The February vote will, if approved, combine two prior parcel taxes, Measure S and Measure Y, into one new tax, which has not been given a ballot designation yet. Like the prior taxes, property owners over 65 can choose to opt out of the tax (see separate story) by filing annually for an exemption.

Clock Stops on NorthernStar Plan to Convert Aging Oil Rig Northwest of Malibu into LNG Facility

• U.S. Coast Guard Raises Hundreds of Safety and Environmental Issues that Must Be Addressed

BY HANS LAETZ


A proposal for a liquefied natural gas terminal on a converted offshore oil rig off Ventura County has prompted nearly 400 questions from the U.S. Coast Guard, a “data gap” that could delay the project for months or years.

The Malibu Surfside News has learned that Coast Guard officials have questions about the proposed NorthernStar LNG terminal that go to the very heart of the proposal’s safety and operations plans, as well as whether it is even needed in the first place.

The Coast Guard has sent the company a list of 396 questions it needs answered before it can process the environmental study, and then decide on a license request, for the project called Clearwater Port. Similar questions cost BHP Billiton a three-year delay on its Cabrillo Port request, and that company’s inability to fully address its data gap list of just 120 questions was one of the reasons its proposed LNG terminal off Malibu was shot down last April.

In a letter obtained by The News, hundreds of questions were raised by the Coast Guard about safety aspects of the NorthernStar proposed project, ranging from how the LNG terminal would handle earthquakes, subsea landslides and high waves, to how the LNG ships would avoid killing whales.

The company had said it expected some questions to arise, and its officials said they expected the fast-track federal licensing “clock” to be stopped at some point. But the breadth and scope of the list of unanswered questions seemed quite broad even to LNG opponents, such as Susan Jordan of the California Coastal Protection Network.

“I’m stunned,” Jordan said when told of the list. She and other coastal activists have yet to see the letter’s details.

Kira Redmond, spokesperson for the Santa Barbara Channelkeeper, said the “long-term and potentially devastating impacts” of the proposal makes her group “gratified the Coast Guard has taken our concerns and others seriously, and stopped the clock to gather additional information.”

The SBC, an environmental group that champions environmental issues in the Channel Islands area, announced that it has hired the Environmental Defense Center, which played a major part in the defeat of Cabrillo Port, to employ scientists and environmental lawyers to oppose the project.

NorthernStar proposes to take out oil wells on the offshore rig and use the platform to warm up LNG that would be unloaded at two new floating docks it would build in 320 feet of water about 10 miles off Ventura. The oil rig’s wells would be taken out of production, abandoning about 2 million barrels of recoverable oil in the ground beneath it—one of the issues the Coast Guard wants NorthernStar to address.

As reported in The News three weeks ago, federal law prohibits taking an offshore oil platform out of production if petroleum can still profitably be recovered. With oil prices ratcheting up above $90 a barrel, the small oil company that currently owns the rig has resumed drilling for oil on the platform, known as Platform Grace, that NorthernStar wants to turn into an LNG regasification site.

The federal letter is a laundry list of concerns, most of them about the safety of the plan. The list notes that NorthernStar’s data about freighter traffic in the local area, one of the busiest sea lanes in the world, is more than five years old and out of date. It also notes that NorthernStar mistakenly said ships in the nearby coastal lanes are under Coast Guard traffic control, when they are not.

Some of the Coast Guard questions go to the very concept of locating an LNG terminal at a place where ships could drag their anchors across existing seafloor pipelines that carry crude oil from several platforms to refineries onshore. And it says the anchoring systems for floating docks in the high seas, with cables bolted to the ocean floor amidst crude oil and natural gas pipelines, need further explanations.

The federal letter asks why NorthernStar has not addressed two active earthquake faults reported in a 2007 geologic study, even though the federal government asked NorthernStar about them last February.

The Coast Guard letter notes that “the application lacks a list or map describing land uses along the proposed and alternative project locations, and information about sensitive land uses and their locations, particularly churches, schools, hospitals, day-care centers, etc.” Because the project proposes high-pressure gas pipelines through Oxnard neighborhoods, the government wants to know precisely how many structures would be in the hazard zone.

NorthernStar’s project manager, Billy Owens, said the questions “do not go to the soundness, but to the necessary detail to ensure that one understands the environmental protections that we will build into the plant.”

Owens said many of the posed questions are answered in other parts of the 3141-page application filed by the company last summer. Others, however, he said might take months of additional research, testing and study to answer.

Item 400, for example, asks the company to “demonstrate the need for natural gas (particularly LNG) as an energy source, providing information on the supply of, and demand for natural gas in California.” The Coast Guard asks NorthernStar to show why the new Costa Azul import terminal near Tijuana, with a capacity equal to one-tenth of the total demand on the west coast of North America, can’t handle import needs.

“That will probably be the biggest piece of work we have to do,” Owens said. “That is a critical task item that everyone is yelling about.”

Opponents of the project say the severe environmental impacts of the proposed oil rig conversion outweigh the benefits for what could become an expensive, underused competitor to the Baja LNG terminal, owned by the San Diego natural gas trading firm Sempra, parent company of the Southern California Gas Company.

The Coast Guard also wants to know how NorthernStar computed potential fog banks that might be generated by the operation of the ambient air vaporizers, which will act like huge refrigerator coils in moist marine air.

“We are hardly going to see any fog out there from this project,” Owens said. In perfectly still air, he said water vapor would cascade off the platform and form a circle of fog 6-8 feet above the water and 65-70 feet in diameter.

“We’re not going to enshroud the platform and the carriers in fog,” he vowed.

Among other questions, the Coast Guard wants to know:
• what the converted oil rig will look like to persons on nearby boats and on the shore,
• how tall the facility will be,
• how much smog will be generated, and how that was calculated.
• why this oil rig was picked, and why the project wouldn’t be better in another location,
• whether the high-pressure gas pipelines can withstand underwater landslides and river-flood rocks sweeping down from the nearby mouth of the Santa Clara River,
• what the effect of supercold water on plankton and other creatures will be, a subject brought up but not addressed in earlier letters,
• what the emergency response plan for pipeline leaks on shore will be,
• why no substantive risk assessment discussion for the onshore pipeline was provided,
• why there is no discussion of potential safety hazards for introducing the imported gas directly into the existing natural gas system,
• why the application does not address the impact on tourism, and
• what the historical wave heights at the site are.

Owens said it could be two-to-three weeks before the company “gets a handle on just how deep they want us to go on all this.”

The NorthernStar proposal, 35 miles northwest of Malibu, is one of two LNG terminals proposed for the local area. A second, proposed by Woodside Natural Gas for 21.8 miles offshore Point Dume, is proceeding through the regulatory process several weeks behind the NorthernStar plan.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Black Sunday in Malibu: Flames from Canyon Fire Break the Dawn

• Powerful and Erratic Winds Dictate Where and When of 4400-Acre Blaze

BY HANS LAETZ


Malibu dodged yet another bullet as 4400 acres of canyons and mountains from Puerco Canyon east to Las Flores Canyon burned this week, destroying just six houses and two landmarks, but filling the world’s television screens with yet another Malibu disaster.

The Canyon Fire will be remembered, perhaps, for showing that lessons have been learned from past conflagrations. Brush clearance, improved fire-safe building techniques and—most importantly—an aggressive deployment of firefighters saved the city, officials said.

Three firefighters suffered heat injuries, and the city was locked down under evacuation orders with school closures for half a week.

The first crew to arrive at the ignition point near the Malibu Canyon tunnel said high voltage lines had failed, sparking the blaze in 80 mile-per-hour, hurricane-force winds. The fire was already spreading east towards Rindge Dam and south toward Pepperdine University when the first crew rolled up at 4:55 a.m. Sunday.

The firestorm caught the city sleeping, the roads empty, and the conditions perfect for a conflagration as fire lashed down Malibu Creek on the east side of the road, and on its west side crossed two ridges to reach the Malibu Civic Center area within three hours of ignition.

A steep gully running down from the Hughes Research Laboratories into Winter Canyon carried the fire like an crucible—“flames were spilling down that arroyo like molten metal,” one firefighter said. That ignited the Malibu Presbyterian Church, the Malibu Glass and Mirror business and a house on Harbor View Drive.

The fire then spread sideways along the base of the hill just north of City Hall, and television pictures from overhead showed it turn back up the hill and engulf Castle Kashan, the faux palace owned by New York socialite Lilly Lawrence that towered for 30 years over Malibu’s heart.

Fingers of the fire branched off and around buildings, then reconnected as they blasted across Pacific Coast Highway towards Malibu Colony. Patches of burning trees and brush swirled around nearly all the buildings within sight of Legacy Park.

City Hall was spared, but trees and the old greenhouses ignited around it, cutting power to the emergency center there.

Fire Captain Anthony Iacono’s engine was rolling in from Hawthorne past the pier and was dispatched to protect condominiums on Vista Pacifica Street, just off Civic Center Way.

“One guy ran down the driveway and said ‘my house is burning.’ so we put it out,” he said.

The fire had wrapped around Webster Elementary School and brush was aflame in all directions. “We couldn’t leave anyone there—they needed us at Carbon Canyon—so we took some thermal pictures, wet the whole thing down, and took off,” Iacono said.

By 10 a.m. Sunday, trees at the Colony Village Shopping Center had flashed over with flame, and only a heavy contingent of firefighters on the roof saved the Bank of America, CVS Pharmacy, and Ralph’s Supermarket from succumbing to the numerous spot fires popping up atop the fancy strip mall.

Soon, Ralph’s reopened, but at first only for firefighters. A running tab was adding up on the one register operating.

CVS was closed, and would also stay so for two days. A hollow clock tower tilted at a crazy angle, but firefighters said damage was limited to non-structural elements of the main buildings.

Incident Commander John Tripp said the fire had originally been expected to veer west after it hit the Pacific.

“Our original contingency was that this fire would burn to the west all the way to Ventura County,” Tripp said. “Think about all the people and houses there.

“The winds instead blew it to the east today. If they change tonight, it could be just that bad.”

But the fire’s westward momentum was stopped by bulldozers and handcrews working above Puerco Canyon. Its eastern flank, however, found fuel and winds and pushed around the northern side of Serra Estates Sunday, burning brush under the canopy of trees as far south as the one-lane bridge across Malibu Creek.

There, crews from several City of Los Angeles fire engines sent up from the Miracle Mile district used shovels and hoses to protect structures. None burned, and the wooden bridge was saved.

One mile south, two Baywatch boats kept a steady stream of salt water on the undersides of the venerable Malibu Pier as sparks and brands landed on top. State Parks Department fire trucks sat at Adamson House to protect that local icon.

In between them, two surfers tried the waves at Surfrider, which were blowing back in the gale. One of them secured instant TV fame by proclaiming “it’s too smoky to surf today” through his bandanna.

The fire moved east across Sweetwater Mesa, burning down to the McDonald’s restaurant, the Jakk’s Pacific Building and several apartment houses on Pacific Coast Highway. By 3 p.m. Monday, it had divided: north around Carbon Mesa, south along PCH towards Fire Station 70.

Flames laid down overnight, but just before sunrise Monday came roaring back. The northern flank pushed south down Carbon Canyon, going up a small rise to take out a historic house just uphill from the fire station.

Winds were blowing into the canyon from the northeast at 60 miles per hour, firefighters said, causing a vortex of wind to push the fire in the opposite direction, up to Rambla Pacifico. Worries about houses being cut off by the decade-long landslide road closure gave way to a slow moving fire, engines in every driveway, and calm as flames made their way uphill and around houses.

One Rambla family lost a Prius and a Mercedes in a garage as a momentary firestorm swirled. But the firetruck and crew stationed in the driveway saved the house.

Shortly after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s photo op at the Civic Center Monday morning, a massive blossom of fire suddenly developed at the top of Carbon Canyon, crossing Piuma Road north toward the Saddle Peak radio towers. The mountain looked volcano-like as smoke spewed thousands of feet into the air.

“The winds were blowing south up against that mountain top, and that stopped the fire from burning over to Calabasas,” said county fire spokesperson Kurt Schaefer.

By Monday night, activity concentrated around houses northwest of Los Flores Canyon, which were saved. Nearly 1800 firefighters were assigned to Malibu, prompting grumbling in inland areas where some people told reporters Malibu was getting more than its share of state resources.

“Those people are wrong,” said Los Angeles County fire chief P. Michael Freeman. “It’s not just who has the biggest mouth gets all the resources.”

Freeman said the Malibu fire broke out a full day before destructive brushfires erupted elsewhere in the county. “We have been here before and we know what fire in this area can do,” Freeman said. “We never hold things in reserve, that would be wasteful.”

The chief said he had 1200 firefighters in Malibu Sunday afternoon, and immediately shifted 400 of them to Santa Clarita as fires there broke out and exploded into houses. “The requests for crews up north were filled as they came in.”

By Tuesday morning, arriving crews from the San Francisco Bay Area had replaced Los Angeles County firefighters, who had moved east and north to new blazes.

Residents were thankful for the firefighting efforts by the weary men and women, sleepless and haggard after two straight days in the desert winds.

Gasoline and ice cream bars were sold out at Trancas by Monday night, and the sole grocery store still open in the city was running low on sushi, chips and less expensive brands of beer.

“That’s Malibu, they can’t cook but they sure know how to watch fires on TV,” marveled Kathy Ruddell, night manager at HOWS Trancas Market.

Some Pepperdine students were stranded at the PCH/Kanan-Dume signal late Monday, unable to get to their dorms. A CHP officer, not much older than the students, directed them to the Malibu High School Red Cross center.

In the school’s gym, 200 bone-weary and sweat-soaked inmate camp crew workers slept soundly on the wooden floor, lying atop blankets as the mercury hit 85 degrees at 11 p.m.

Some firefighters, however, were able to shower or sleep in the swanky new remodeled rooms at Malibu Beach Inn, where owner David Geffen threw open the doors to public service workers.

The scene Tuesday morning was dramatically different, with no smoke visible anywhere along the six-mile-wide fire. Firefighters shifted to mop-up mode, helicopters were parked to await flare-ups, and damage assessments began at the Civic Center.

Fire staffing at Malibu was cut to 898, with the remainder sent to San Diego or the Lake Arrowhead area, and full containment was predicted for the Canyon Fire on Friday.

Public facilities were not significantly damaged, Webster Elementary School appeared hardest hit, as principal Phil Cott stood next to a row of charred palm trees Tuesday.

“These big palm trees might fall now, might need to be cut down, or maybe they’re OK here and will grow back,” Cott said. “We have a lot of painting to do, and one teacher is going to have to move her classroom.

A modular classroom that housed a 45-station computer lab, and another holding a teacher preparation area, were lost to fire at Our Lady of Malibu parochial school in Winter Canyon, the school announced Tuesday night.

The two buildings are partially insured, and reconstruction will begin Thursday, said co-principal Susan Richey.

She said flames “burned right up to the classrooms on campus that have been there 47 years, but they weren’t touched.

“But it took out the trailers that were behind the school, that housed the computer lab.”

The school will remain closed until at least next Monday.

Across the street, Webster Elementary will also remain closed through Monday. All other public schools in Malibu resumed classes on Wednesday.

Loss of Charter Cable Link Exacerbated Crisis Conditions for Malibu

• City Officials Decry Lack of Backup Equipment for TV, Internet and Phone Services

BY HANS LAETZ


Charter Cable customers were disconnected from the e-world Sunday, when the only Charter line to the outside world burned at Bluffs Park, taking out that company’s vital cable television, Internet and telephone service during the fire emergency.

Compounding the problem, Charter could not begin repairing individual connections anywhere in Malibu until the connections to the company’s technical center in Monterey Park were restored, which was supposed to happen Tuesday night.

Some angry customers, including Malibu’s mayor pro tem, said they wanted to know why a crucial communications link did not have a backup, and why it was placed over a mesa where predictable Malibu catastrophes often sever utility lines.

City officials expressed surprise that Charter had removed local television reception equipment from Malibu, and transferred all local technical operations to a facility 40 miles away, connected only by a single fiber connection hanging above miles of disaster-vulnerable Pacific Coast Highway.

“That’s incredible, that’s unacceptable,” said Malibu mayor pro tem Pamela Conley Ulich, whose home Internet and e-mail service was dead. “I’m surprised they don’t have alternate lines, and I’m disappointed.”

The failure of the entire system left people in the city in varying degrees of electronic nonexistence. Most affected are persons who switched their landline telephone service to a cable-internet-telephone bundle, and lost all three services.

Ninety percent of Charter’s Malibu customers, and all of them in Topanga Canyon, were affected. A relative handful of Malibu Charter customers were able to see local television via a jury-rigged antenna system that could not be extended citywide, said Charter vice president Craig Watson.

Service went out Sunday morning when the firm lost 4000 feet of fiber optic cable in the Canyon Fire’s first hour.

Watson said his crews were staging equipment and personnel in Malibu Monday, but could not begin to restring the key link until Southern California Edison crews finished replacing poles across the mesa between Bluffs Park and the Ralph’s supermarket.

But Edison elected to abandon that reach of power poles Tuesday morning, Watson said. At first light Tuesday, Charter crews began drilling new pole holes and getting ready to plug Malibu back into the worldwide grid.

Fiber junctions must be spliced, a delicate and time-consuming operation involving technicians working with microscopes, he said.

From the beginning of cable TV service until a few months ago, Malibu residents received cable television signals from a “head-end” at the north end of Latigo Canyon Road. But the company, as it upgraded to an all-digital system that can handle advanced internet and telephone services, removed all the TV reception gear in Malibu and placed it at an operations center in Monterey Park, 10 miles east of downtown Los Angeles.

“This was done so we could provide our customers with a centralized, professionally-staffed service center,” Watson said. “All television signals, as well as the controls and signals for Internet and telephones, now come from our operations center in Monterey Park.”

The company has acknowledged that it needed a backup connection in case the path to Monterey Park failed anywhere along the 50-mile route.

“Ironically, we have a signed contract in hand right now to provide a second link in to Malibu,” Watson said. The fire, however, hit before that backup fiber optic could be patched into to the new system.

In western Malibu, far away from the fire front and blocked by mountains from over-the-air local television, worried people went to neighbors with satellite dishes to see pictures of the fire and learn what was happening.

Verizon landline phone and Internet service interruptions were limited to places where equipment burned, a spokesperson said, and cellular phone service from various providers was not disrupted along the length of Malibu. Satellite TV reception, and off-air reception in the few areas that have it were unaffected by the fire.

Although some areas of Malibu sporadically lost electric service due to the windstorm, most of the city had continuous service during the emergency.

Water service from Los Angeles County Water District 29 was not interrupted during the fires or winds. Crews worked day and night to make sure that booster stations, hydrants and other key links were functioning normally.

Watson, whose company is in the midst of a campaign to win converts to its packaged phone and internet services, said the loss of service in Malibu was “particularly painful.”

“We understand that we are not just in the cable business anymore and, because of that we understand that our customers are reliant on our service,” Watson said.

Large Crowd at Malibu Post-Fire Forum Heaps Praise on Firefighters

• Residents Are Critical of Collapse of Key Cable Provider and Its Impact on Information

BY HANS LAETZ


It was hard to find a happier crowd than the 300 Malibu residents in Malibu High School’s auditorium Tuesday night, when Los Angeles County firefighters were repeatedly interrupted with applause as they answered questions about the Canyon Fire from Malibuites.

But the happiness and gratitude instantly evaporated when the subject turned to Charter Communications, whose representatives were raked over the coals by residents who said they were furious over telephone, cable TV and Internet outages.

Fire Commander John Tripp got a standing ovation after announcing that fire lines had been extended around 75 percent of the fire as of 6 p.m. Tuesday, and that Pacific Coast Highway had been reopened at the same time.

“Today we woke up and saw no smoke, not one wisp. That was good news,” he said, as this fire’s peculiar pattern Monday and Tuesday of spreading slowly into the approaching winds meant that it consumed all of the available fuel.

“We thought it would be several days before we would be at this point,” he said.

Tripp said hotspots in the 4400 acres of rugged, burned terrain may remain, and could reignite over the next few days. A helicopter equipped with an infrared camera was to begin low-altitude flights over the burned zone, and line crews and other resources will be sent into the mountains for mop-up.

“For the next few days we’re going to keep resources here, you are going to see resources, we’re going to be your neighbor,” he said.

The incident commander walked residents through the first hours of the fire, and praised people in the Civic Center and Malibu Knolls area for instantly getting out of bed and following orders to evacuate. “That saved lives, and we had the potential to lose a lot of lives.

“4:55 a.m. is absolutely the worst time to have a fire in Malibu. The very first thing I had to deal with was a bunch of people startled awake, and following a sheriff down the hill.”

Lost Hills Sheriff’s Captain Tom Martin thanked residents for obeying road closures and mandatory evacuations. “Driving through this fire was one of the scariest things I had ever done,” he said.

The officer thanked Malibu horse owners for acting quickly to evacuate more than 100 horses from Malibu ranches before the roads clogged with incoming fire engines.

“I want to encourage everyone who has a business on PCH to go and make sure you are secure,” Martin said. “We are going to have roving patrols, but there are a few places where the fire department had to smash windows to go in and check things, and we don’t want any looting.”

But as happy as residents were with public safety agencies, they were chomping at the bit to tear into Charter’s new vice president for Southern California, Fred Lutz, who stepped up with apologies and promises to do better.

“When are we going to get the channels back on?” yelled one little boy as the meeting began.

“We want to know how we get information when the cable is out,” yelled a woman.

“You can’t have a neighborhood phone tree unless you have information to give out,” shouted another.

“Forget about Charter, we need to have an emergency backup system,” said a third.

Lutz acknowledged shortcomings with the system, asked for patience, and promised citywide “service will be restored by [Wednesday] at 6 a.m.”

County Supervisors Air Issues at Hearing on Proposed LCP for Santa Monica Mountains

• Session Is Continued for Another Week to Hear More Testimony

BY BILL KOENEKER


The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors took up consideration of the proposed Local Coastal Program for unincorporated areas of Malibu and the rest of the Santa Monica Mountains at its meeting this week on Tuesday.

The board took no action, but rather listened to a staff report on the document, heard public testimony and continued the matter until Oct. 30 when it is expected the supervisors will take action.

The county’s regional planning commission had previously recommended approval of the LCP.

Eleventh hour opposition came from the civic group, Citizens for a Better LCP, which objected to what it called the “commercialization of horse boarding” in the Santa Monicas that they contend would be allowed under the LCP.

“The proposed LCP actively encourages landowners to keep eight horses per acre. This is an unacceptably high number. Areas where livestock are maintained are typically denuded of all vegetation,” said Jacky de Haviland, who is the president of the group, and acknowledged during an interview that she and others found out much later about the LCP process after the planning commission recommended approval.

“We just did not know about it,” responded de Haviland, who said she and her group had spearheaded an effort to let other environmental groups know about what she considers the objectionable aspects of what she calls “backyard boarding.”

“I am not against equestrian use in the mountains. But this commercial use threatens the ecosystem,” she added.

De Haviland said she believed the ads placed in local media last week might have had an impact on county officials.

Equestrians early on had wanted the county to incorporate and consider in its policies in the LCP the historic significance of equestrian uses in the local mountain range.

Members of Citizens for a Better LCP urged the board to eliminate language that allows the boarding of horses not specifically owned by the landowner.

The group insisted they are not a one-issue organization and also take exception to what they called the “creeping commercialization” that they say is encouraged by the LCP in the form of visitor-serving uses.

“ I can’t understand how having a 40-room bed and breakfast in the Santa Monica Mountains helps protect the mountains. It will bring more traffic, more people and more pollution,” de Haviland said.

The board, before it met, agreed to continue the matter to allow those who could not attend this week due to the area wildfires to testify at the later date.

After the hearing is closed, supervisors can choose to direct the planning staff to make minor changes to the LCP, or, if the board decides that substantial changes concerning issues that were not considered by the planning commission are needed, the document could be returned to the panel for further discussion, according to county officials.

When the board adopts the LCP, it will be submitted to the California Coastal Commission for its review. The coastal panel will hold a public hearing and also accept additional testimony.

If the commission recommends modifications to the LCP, the supervisors will decide whether and how it should be amended to incorporate the coastal panel’s recommendations. If the board makes the changes recommended by the state agency, the LCP will be certified and the county will then take on the permitting authority.

Monday, October 22, 2007

Malibu: The Canyon Fire: Day Two

HEADLINE UPDATE

Fire is burning across the northern edge of La Costa, where 225 houses burned in 1993. Structure protection there. No losses yet.

Fire now at 2400 acres. 10 percent containment.

Flames seen atop Saddle Peak, just south of the communications towers. Fire is moving east at low speed.

Destroyed: 5 houses, the church and the glass and mirror business.
Damaged: 9 houses, 5 businesses.

Kanan Dume Road is open, contrary to radio reports.

Voluntary evacuations now called for Sunset Mesa.

$1.2 million in firefighting costs so far.

One firefighter injured-heat exhaustion-yesterday.

Fire is burning up west side of Rambla Pacifico.

One garage (with a Prius in it) burned on the west side of Rambla Pacifico between Hume and Las Flores Canyon Road (Camp 8).

Fire has crossed Rambla Pacifico in several places, but is burning into the wind, very slowly in most cases.

County Fire Chief Michael Freeman says Malibu did not get more than its fair share of resources, despite anger from Santa Clarita residents that engines were shifted here that could have been kept in reserve there.

PCH is likely to be closed at least through tomorrow, making school openings unlikely.

The big worry for Monday night: winds will shift and blow from the northeast and east, possibly causing fire to spread west into Puerco and Latigo canyons.

City is promising to remove blown-over trees on Guernsey and other Malibu Park streets today.

Governor came to Malibu at 11 a.m. for a briefing and photo op.

—Hans Laetz

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Malibu Fire Photos

7:10 a.m.—Malibu Canyon Road. A camp crew tries to start a firebreak, about 1/4 mile north of the Malibu Castle. Within minutes, the crew realized the fire, which was moving fast to the south on either side of the road, had outflanked them. The crew pulled out shortly afterward. MSN Photos/Hans Laetz

11:20 a.m.—As fire races south down Malibu Creek, state fire trucks took up positions surrounding the Adamson House at Malibu Lagoon. Two county Baywatch boats sprayed the wooden Malibu Pier all morning, in case any brands or sparks landed on it.




12:55 p.m.—Fire burns down to apartment buildings just east of the Malibu Pier.

12:58 p.m.—Two Orange County firefighters watch the L.A. County Skycrane check flames just north of apartment buildings on PCH.

1:40 p.m.—Firefighters arriving at the top of Carbon Mesa assess the situation as fire burns down the southeast flank of the fire.

3:05 p.m.—As fire hooks around from the north into the upper reaches of Carbon Mesa, firefighters light backfires to deprive the fire of fuel.

4:10 p.m.—Movie mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg's home on Carbon Beach was covered in fire protection foam, presumably at his request.

6:40 p.m.—Wreckage of a car, apparently a Jaguar, abandoned and burned on an eerily empty Pacific Coast Highway. Beyond, hundreds of firefighters and dozens of fire trucks at the assembly point on Civic Center Way.

7:00 p.m.—Molten aluminum that once was expensive windows oozes down a hillside in front of what used to be the Malibu Glass & Mirror business in Winter Canyon, just north of Webster Elementary School.
7:05 p.m.— The north side of Webster Elementary School suffered damage in the fire at about 10 a.m. No classrooms or other permanent structures were burned at Webster or Our Lady of Malibu Catholic Church and school.

7:30 p.m.—Fire bosses explain the night's plan in front of a map of Malibu's Canyon Fire. The fire area outlined in red is not contained; the boundary in black shows containment areas along Piuma Road near Saddle Peak, and along Pacific Coast Highway. All the other fire lines were uncontained as of 6 p.m.

MALIBU: The Canyon Fire: Oct. 21, 2007

SUNDAY NIGHT HEADLINE UPDATE


No one hurt or killed.
Five houses burned.
1200 acres burned by 7 p.m.


Two commercial structures lost: the Malibu Presbyterian Church and the Malibu Glass and Mirror business on Winter Canyon Road.


Webster Elementary School was singed—storage and garden facilities on the northern edge were lost, but the school was saved.


Our Lady of Malibu Catholic Church and School scorched but no serious damage.
Ralph’s Supermarket not damaged— freezers and coolers not affected. But the store is open to firefighters and police only.


CVS Pharmacy not damaged but closed.


Businesses in Malibu Colony Shopping Center not seriously damaged, but numerous spot fires broke out in landscaping and building facades, and on roofs. Some trees in the parking lot blew over before the fire crews arrived.


Malibu Schools will be closed Monday.


Malibu High School evacuation center is open but unused.


PCH closed to all but Malibu residents westbound at Topanga Canyon.

PCH hard closed eastbound at Kanan Dume, but some people are getting through.

Kanan Dume Road open and unimpeded.

Malibu Canyon Road open to utility crews only.

No fire at or near Monte Nido.

The fire lines on Saddle Peak also held.

There are virtually no fire lines to the west or toward Puerco Canyon. There are no fire lines to the east either.

Spot fires are still being put out near Malibu City Hall, Winter Canyon, and Hughes Labs.

Evacuations are reportedly in progress in Topanga Canyon’s southern neighborhoods.

Most vacant land in the Civic Center area burned. Most structures did not.
The County Fire Department will not release the addresses of burned structures. It is believed that two burned on Malibu Road, two burned on Malibu Crest—one of them the Malibu Castle (Castle Kashan). One house may have burned in the Malibu Creek area, but that is not confirmed.

Malibu Tow emerged unburned, except for six crashed vehicles in the impound yard.

Adamson House not touched. Baywatch boats wet the Malibu Pier down.

One thousand hot meals and two thousand sack lunches were distributed tonight.

Crews are being told no relief is on the way, and to grab naps in their trucks if possible. Ten other major incidents in Southern California mean no more resources will be sent to Malibu tonight.

Sheriff’s deputies are guarding two banks and the Malibu Castle “in case anyone gets any ideas,” a sheriff’s commander says.



The Canyon Fire: Sunday Night Update

By Hans Laetz


For Malibu residents, the 2007 Canyon Fire was a familiar crisis, but different. The fire caught Malibu residents largely at home, before dawn on a weekend; meaning roads were open and clear from the beginning.

That meant fire trucks had an open set of roadways as they streamed into Malibu Sunday morning.

The day began for many residents at about 1 a.m., when the predicted Santa Ana winds arrived. Those who ventured outside smelled smoke—but it was from a fire 40 miles north, near Castaic.

Winds at Point Mugu were clocked above 50 miles per hour as the night went on, and eventually reached 108 miles per hour at one mountaintop station in Ventura County.

The fire was sparked at 4:50 a.m. Sunday, when a power pole on Malibu Canyon Road dropped its 14,000-volt lines just northwest of the old Sheriff’s Honor Rancho turnoff. Crews from the first truck to arrive singled out the failed power line as the source of the fire, but an official investigation will follow.

By 7 a.m., fire had spread in two prongs: east down the side of Malibu Canyon as far as the northern edge of Serra Estates, and west over two ridge-tops toward Pepperdine University and Hughes Research Labs.

At 7:20, a firefighter warned this reporter that the power lines he was standing under, watching the fire in Malibu Canyon just north of HRL, were liable to topple. They did, about a half hour later.

At 8:40, the western prong of the fire had topped the ridge above Pepperdine, and was burning down the eastern fringe of the campus. Another tongue of fast-moving fire funneled down a steep arroyo, across Malibu Canyon Road and into Winter Canyon.

That fire quickly engulfed Malibu Presbyterian Church, which was fully in flames less than five minutes after the first flames began licking at it.

A few minutes later, the northern edge of Webster Elementary School was aflame. Fire trucks streaming up Winter Canyon concentrated on the school, the adjacent Our Lady of Malibu Catholic Church, and the major electrical substation and switching yard in the canyon.

At 9, the landscaping at Malibu Colony Shopping Center was ablaze.
By midday, the fire had stopped spreading to the east. Serra Retreat was smoldering, but few structures were burned. All of the underbrush north of the one-lane bridge was burned, right up to structures. Los Angeles City firefighters were working with shovels to save houses near the Retreat.

At 2 p.m., the fire had burned to the east behind Serra Estates and over Sweetwater Mesa. Fire trucks saved the office buildings, stores and apartments on the north side of Pacific Coast Highway as the fire edged east behind McDonald’s and PC Greens.

To the north, the fire was raging unchecked through the rugged canyons and backcountry. The eastward spread put the 40 or so houses on the dead-end loop of Carbon Mesa in the fire’s target.

Heavy use of fire helicopters, and slackening winds, put the fire out on its southern march towards the signal at Carbon Canyon Road. North of the mesa, the fire went up a canyon to the northeast, then reversed itself and came up a ridge.

Homes there were saved by firefighters who lit backfires, robbing the fire of its fuel.

By 6 p.m. there were scant pockets of smoke rising from the fire area. Winds were slack as well. But the winds were kicking up again, as they often do right at sunset.

At 6:15 p.m., helicopters had to return to the fire’s origin point, near the Malibu Canyon tunnel. The resurgent wind had whipped embers into a wall of flame in the bramble of brush just above the old Rindge Dam.

Once again, the potential for disaster had shifted to the west.

The fire boss—at 7 p.m.—warns: “Our original contingency was that this fire would burn to the west all the way to Ventura County. Think about all the people and houses there.

“The winds instead blew it to the east today. If they change tonight, it could be just that bad.

Firefighters were told tonight there are 10 major fires in Southern California and no more resources are coming to Malibu.

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

State Agency Targets Illegal Signs and Encroachments in Malibu

• Coastal Commission Enforcement Takes Aim at Counterfeit ‘No Parking’ Postings

BY HANS LAETZ


A regional Coastal Commission enforcement official says Malibu residents who have put up their own, official-looking “No Parking” signs may expect enforcement action soon. And one of the biggest offenders may be the City of Malibu itself.

Pat Veesart, senior enforcement team leader a the Coastal Commission’s Ventura office, said his office received numerous complaints last summer from people about a growing rash of ‘No Parking’ signs at several Malibu public access points, including Lechusa, Broad, Little Dume, Escondido and Latigo beaches.

An even bigger problem may be the wholesale taking of public streets for landscaping, walls or private parking places in some areas, he said. “Public land has been absconded with by private property owners.”

Some of the worst abuses may be along the west end of Broad Beach Drive, near where the state has obtained easements to allow public foot access to Lechusa Beach, but where on-street parking has been eliminated over the decades by resident encroachment, Veesart said.

Volunteer surveyors have measured the public right of way on Broad Beach Road and found trees, mailboxes, private driveways and stairways encroaching onto public property. The situation, Veesart said, is particularly bad west of Bunnie Drive, where the public road suddenly narrows even though the right-of-way line does not.

“These are the only parking places available to access the beach that the people of the State of California paid a lot to acquire,” he said Friday, as he looked at rock walls and other permanent structures that extended at least 15 feet over the right of way line and onto Broad Beach Road, a former state highway with a broad right of way.

“All along Broad Beach Road there are a lot of parking places that look private,” said Jenny Price, a Los Angeles resident who frequently uses Malibu beaches, accessways and parks. Price runs an advocacy group called LA Urban Rangers that offers tours of publicly-owned areas along the Malibu coast, places that some oceanfront homeowners consider their own.

Last Friday, Veesart showed the Malibu Surfside News more than a dozen homes along Broad Beach Road where walls intruded onto the public road, and where landscaping or pavement was used to make a public parking place look like private property.

“If you park here, the homeowner will come out and tell you ‘you’re on private property,’ and because it looks like it, a deputy would reasonably cite you or tow your car away,” he said.

Veesart said no one at the commission has any problem with what he called “no harm, no foul” landscaping, walls or staircases on the side of the road, unless they block potential parking or convey a message that a piece of road that the State of California bought in 1931 from the Rindge family has become private.

The enforcement official said he plans to meet soon with City of Malibu officials over official-looking “No Parking” signs set up all over the western end of Malibu. He said he is particularly concerned about several new signs banning parking near Geoffrey’s Restaurant that were not posted by the California Department of Transportation, which owns and controls Highway 1.

“These signs are right next to the Escondido accessway, and they have the effect of banning parking on the publicly-owned road shoulder. Caltrans tells me they were installed by the City of Malibu at the request of homeowners, but I don’t know who put them up.

“If they affect access to the publicly-owned beach, then a coastal development permit must be applied for, noticed and granted by the responsible city,” Veesart said, even thought the responsible agency within city limits is the City of Malibu itself.

“The implication is ‘OK, you public jerks, there are only two parking places for you here and no more,’” Price said.

Veesart said ‘No Parking’ zones near Point Dume may greatly exceed what is permissible under a nearly-10-year-old agreement that got Malibu off the hook for violating coastal access rules. Under that compromise, a small parking area was built on Cliffside Drive for surfers and flower lovers to enjoy the adjacent state park.

In exchange, the city removed boulders it had dumped on the public land to prevent parking, and was allowed to ban parking in the immediate area.

Since then, tow-away zones have extended more than a half mile on three nearby streets.

Veesart said he would contact the city to determine if the signs were officially installed, and check with commission lawyers to see if they are legal.

“I have the feeling that the majority of Malibu residents use the beach and do not favor private owners taking over public property,” Veesart said. But he said the city, like all cities along the coast, must follow the letter of the law as drawn up in the Local Coastal Plan that was adopted at the order of the state legislature.

Complications May Impact Approval Process for Area LNG Plans

• Resumption of Oil Drilling Is a Factor for One; Naval Concerns Surface on the Other

BY HANS LAETZ


In an ironic twist, a proposal for a liquefied natural gas terminal 10 miles off Oxnard may be in trouble because a local oil company has resumed drilling for crude oil from its offshore rig. Venoco, a Carpinteria-based oil company that owns several offshore oil rigs in the Santa Barbara channel, has resumed drilling for crude oil at Platform Grace.

Drilling at the offshore oil rig, 35 miles up the coast from Malibu, stopped in 1997 because much of the underlying raw crude and gas had been pumped out. But federal officials said Monday that another 2 million barrels of oil, and as much as 2 million cubic feet of natural gas, can still be recovered from beneath Platform Grace.

The recently renewed Venoco drilling may complicate NorthernStar Energy’s efforts, because of federal law that requires offshore rigs to be used only for oil extraction so long as there is commercially viable petroleum under them, a federal official said Monday.

That oil and gas would be locked up forever if the platform is converted to an LNG import terminal, a federal official said. “There will not be any consideration of simultaneous use of the platform for both oil and LNG uses,” said John Romero, a spokesperson for the U.S. Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service—the nation’s regulatory agency for offshore oil rigs.

Venoco sold an option to NorthernStar, an Orange County start-up company, four years ago to convert the nearly unused oil platform into an LNG terminal that NorthernStar calls “Clearwater Port.”

Under terms of that deal, Venoco will have to seal off its new oil wells, decommission crude oil facilities and hand the offshore oil platform over to NorthernStar when and if it gets permission for an LNG terminal from government officials. NorthernStar has applied to convert the rig to unload natural gas shipped across the ocean to add to the California energy portfolio.

NorthernStar vice president Billy Owens said Monday the resumption of drilling by Venoco might delay the project as it makes its way through various agencies, “but we don’t see this as a material delay.

“The possibility of Venoco drilling for oil while we are waiting for our permits has been contemplated since day one,” he said. “They have every right to drill until we exercise our option (to buy the platform lease), and they have the obligation to cease drilling and have the site restored the day that happens.”

Transferring Platform Grace from oil drilling duties to use as a seaborne LNG terminal has been a longstanding legal concern at the MMS division of the U.S. Interior Department, documents uncovered by the Malibu Surfside News this week indicate. And another federal official who could not be quoted said discussions between the Interior Department and the Homeland Security Department’s Coast Guard, which regulates offshore ports, have not resolved the issue yet.

NorthernStar last year asked for federal oversight of Platform Grace to be taken away from Interior’s MMS and assigned to the Deepwater Ports section under Homeland Security. Coastal advocates have criticized the Deepwater Ports office as being overly friendly to LNG interests.

Venoco’s decision to resume oil extraction was the subject of an MMS official’s letter in September 2006 to NorthernStar: “The oil and gas production will be considered the primary function of the platform, and the possibility of continuing economic recovery of the resources using these wells could delay conversion of the platform to an LNG facility,” wrote Nabil Masri.

In its most recent letter to NorthernStar, sent last month, the MMS official in charge of the agency’s West Coast office said that, despite agreements to transfer jurisdiction from MMS to the Deepwater Ports Office, the LNG terminal could still be delayed unless “Venoco proposes an alternative means to recovery of these [remaining oil and gas] resources.”

Venoco owns several nearby offshore rigs, but it is not known if they can economically extract the oil and gas that lies beneath Grace. Venoco officials would not comment last week or Monday.

Owens said NorthernStar officials learned of the renewed Venoco drilling “when we were out there a few months ago and we saw a new crane operating out there, we asked them what they were doing, and they said, ‘We are putting in a new drill.’”

The LNG project is opposed by many coastal residents, who say the 28-year-old tower in 320 feet of salt water cannot safely be converted to LNG regasification purposes. The company says the platform is rock-solid and will be vigorously inspected as the top of it is cut off and rebuilt to handle LNG, but important engineering studies are being withheld from the public as proprietary information.

Chevron built Platform Grace in 1979, and sold it to Venoco after taking 8.8 million barrels of crude oil and 22.4 million cubic feet of natural gas from the site, MMS says. Since then, the platform has been used only as a junction point for undersea oil pipelines, but has been picked by NorthernStar as the best place to reheat LNG that would be unloaded and regasified there from tankers from Asia or Russia.

WOODSIDE LNG PROJECT

The NorthernStar project off Oxnard is one of two LNG terminals near Malibu currently undergoing regulatory review. The other project, from Woodside Natural Gas, would be centered at a new buoy site 21.8 miles southwest of Point Dume.

That project, called “Ocean- Way,” came under opposition from U.S. Navy and Navy boosters last week, because it would rely heavily on a section of ocean where Navy ships frequently conduct military exercises.

Woodside proposes to use three areas of nearby ocean to transfer LNG cargoes at sea from transpacific ships to a pair of regasification vessels that would then dock at the buoys south of Malibu to regasify the LNG.

One of the three transfer points would “substantially interfere with Navy operations,” including missile tests, aviation and sea maneuvers, an official Navy statement said.

Retired Rear Admiral George Strohsahl, former commander of Naval Base Ventura County, Point Mugu, told The News that Woodside “has proposed a transfer position that is in the Point Mugu Sea Test Range, a vital defense interest of the United States Navy.” He said he did not have an opinion on other aspects of the Woodside LNG project.

In Los Angeles, Woodside spokesperson Michael Hinrichs said discussions continue between Woodside and the Navy on the transfer point. “It’s preferable for the transfer to use the calm waters there,” he said of their preferred transfer point about 26 miles off the coast near Santa Barbara Island.

Woodside engineers have said the transfer of super-cold, hose-cracking LNG cannot occur on rough seas, which are more common at the other two points. Hinrichs noted, however, that the Navy has signed off on the proposed location for the LNG terminal itself, as well as the two stormier offshore LNG transfer points, and that negotiations on the issue continue.

Meanwhile, the Coast Guard announced last week that the Woodside LNG proposal has just incurred its first delay, as a computer snafu with a federal filing system has interfered with the tightly-scheduled public comment period.

As a result, officials will accept comments from the public on environmental criteria for the Woodside request until Oct. 31.

These officials have not changed their mind, however, about not holding a hearing in Malibu, as requested by city representatives.

Malibu Planning Commission Recommends Approval of Conservancy Plans

• Critics Voicing Brushfire and Other Public Safety Concerns Are Overruled

BY BILL KOENEKER


Despite opposition from the leaders of a park docents group, neighbors and others, the City of Malibu Planning Commission last week recommended approval of a controversial parks and trails plan sought by the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy that includes overnight camping in Charmlee Wilderness Park.

The plan in the form of a Local Coastal Program amendment will be heard by the city council on Nov. 13 and subsequently certified by the California Coastal Commission at a later date.

To underscore the importance of the meeting to the municipality, City Attorney Christi Hogin, who has not officiated at a planning commission meeting in several years, acted as the panel’s counsel.

SMMC executive director Joe Edmiston, in a move that was also symbolic, appeared in full ranger uniform and spoke to the planning panel.

“There is no place to own or rent property [in Malibu] not at a considerable cost. There is no place for just plain folk to look out over arguably the most beautiful vista in the country,” Edmiston said, in explaining the rationale for providing more camping in the coastal canyons.

He also talked about the initial mistrust between the city and the state agency.

“There was no question we were apprehensive, but were told there was a real advantage going through the city process. I was not a believer. I asked our attorney, ‘Are we going to be screwed?’” the Conservancy head said.

However, Edmiston said in the last six months he changed his mind and believes the ongoing treatment by the city has been “a fair and unbiased process because of the good work of the staff and the good work and will of the people on the dais tonight.”

Commissioners, who made several recommendations in approving the plans, were told there would be a total of eight campsites in Charmlee, and one of those would be an Americans with Disabilities Act camp.

There would be a total of 16 camping sites in Corral Canyon Park, and the addition of several connector trails.

The Ramirez Canyon Park improvements would include three ADA day use areas and two ADA campsites. The city staff had suggested the elimination of three sites for new hike-in camping in the meadow area, and the addition of several connector trails.

Plans also include three parking spaces in an area along the shoulder of Kanan Dume Road and a half-mile connector trail from Kanan to Ramirez Canyon Park.

There would be no overnight camping in either Solstice Canyon Park or Escondido Canyon Park, according to testimony before the planning panel.

Edmiston was grilled by the commissioners about the need for additional recreational camping facilities in the coastal area, given the proliferation of campsites in Point Mugu State Park and Leo Carrillo State Park and the tent camping sites at the Malibu Beach RV Park. Camping is also allowed in Malibu Creek State Park.

The Conservancy head was also asked how the campsites would be patrolled and about the number of rangers available to do this. Edmiston said there are 24 armed rangers that patrol the 50,000 acres administered by the SMMC and its sister agency, the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority.

Almost all of the other speakers who testified before the commission were in opposition to the plan, citing the danger of fire despite being reassured that there would only be what is called “cold camping,” which is described as no campfires allowed.

Residents in other areas of Malibu were also opposed to various aspects of the plan. Steven Amerikaner, an attorney who represents the Ramirez Canyon Preservation Fund, focused on the expanded activities that are allowed by the plan for the Conservancy, which is headquartered in Ramirez Canyon Park. “Will the planning commission be a rubber stamp?” he asked.

Amerikaner also told the commissioners that the amendment sought by the SMMC is not consistent with Malibu’s Local Coastal Program. He explained that was nearly the very thing the organization had successfully litigated with the SMMC and won at the appellate level—that its coastal permit was not consistent with the LCP.

Other property owners complained about the plan, calling for more parking in Escondido area and insisted the parking lot “would pave over paradise.”

When it came time for the commissioners to deliberate, they mainly posed questions to either Edmiston or Hogin and the staff about the particulars of camping, fire dangers, parking and activities at Ramirez Canyon Park.

Chair Regan Schaar told her colleagues she thought the most productive path would be for the commissioners to talk about what they liked or did not like in the plan and make recommendations based on those assertions.

To speed the process along, the city attorney ticked off a list of recommendations she had assembled while the commissioners were asking questions and used those as a springboard for suggested revisions. The planning panelists concurred, and the changes were incorporated into the unanimous recommendation for approval.

Commissioners want to see an audit to determine if the camping uses continue to be needed incorporated into the procedure and also the requirement of a needs assessment as part of an application for a permit for both new camping and parking areas.

Panelists insisted that the plan adopt a specific definition of “cold camping” that includes requirements for the use of battery-operated lights and other technologies that do not include a flame or flammable liquid, such as kerosene, that prohibit the use of charcoal and clear definitions of permitted cooking approaches.

Additionally, the planning panelists wanted a determination as to where campsites would be located to make sure there was no adverse impacts on wildlife corridors.

Other revisions include approval of a new parking lot at Escondido only when a demand study indicates that additional parking is required and expansion of the existing lot is infeasible or inadequate; coordination of bus trips to assure no unnecessary increase in traffic on Point Dume; a requirement that park signs be in English and Spanish: and use of the most restrictive agency’s determination of “red flag” or increased fire hazard warning system; and encouragement of the construction of a road connecting Kanan Dume to Ramirez Canyon Park in connection with any increased activities in the park.

Commissioner Les Moss was the only panelist to speak at length about why he was voting for a recommendation of approval and also how the speakers